STUDI KOMPARATIF KELAYAKAN USAHA DAN PENERAPAN SUBSISTEM AGRIBISNIS DI KELOMPOK TANI SUMBER REJEKI I DAN SUMBER MAKMUR KECAMATAN KRANGGAN KABUPATEN TEMANGGUNG

Yudy Hariyanto^*), Suharti^**)

ABSTRAK

            Tujuan penelitian ini adalah: (1) Mengetahui kelayakan usaha agribisnis Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I, dan Sumber Makmur, Desa Sanggrahan, Kecamatam Kranggan, Kabupaten Temanggung, (2) Mengetahui Penerapan Sub-Sistem agribisnis Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I, dan Sumber Makmur, Desa Sanggrahan, Kecamatam Kranggan, Kabupaten Temanggung, (3) Membandingkan kelayakan usaha dan Penerapan Sub-Sistem agribisnis di Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I, dan Sumber Makmur

Materi penelitian adalah kelayakan usaha dan penerapan sub-sistem agribisnis, pengumpulan data dengan bantuan kuesioner, sedang metode dasar yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah metode deskripsi. Metode pengambilan sample/penentuan responden yang akan digunakan menggunakan purposive sampling yang dilanjutkan dengan simple random sampling untuk menentukan masing-masing 30 orang responden. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara, observasi dan pencatatan, sedangkan analisis data untuk mengetahui penerapan agribisnis dilakukan pengamatan dan pencatatan kegiatan yang dilakukan meliputi subsitem pengadaan sarana produksi (agroinput), subsistem produksi (agro product), subsistem pengolahan dan industri hasil (agroindustry), Subsistem pemasaran hasil (agromarketing) dan subsistem kelembagaan penunjang kegiatan (agro supporting). Sedangkan untuk mengetahui kelayakan usaha agribisnis secara ekonomi dilakukan analisis usahatani meliputi Analisis Keuntungan Bersih Usahatani (NP atau Net Profit), Titik impas pulang modal (BEP atau break event point), Nilai efisiensi penggunaan modal (ROI atau return on investment) dan Nilai kelayakan usahatani (B/C ratio atau benefit/cost ratio)

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) hasil analisis usaha tani secara finansial rata-rata Rp.1.742.441,67 untuk Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I dan rata-rata di Kelompok Tani Sumber Makmur sebesar  Rp.840.933,33, dengan BEP untuk Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I sebesar Rp.5.989.250,00 dan untuk Kelompok Tani Sumber Makmur sebesar Rp.6.287.188,89. ROI untuk Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I sebesar 8,69% dan untuk Kelompok Tani Sumber Makmur sebesar 6,34%, B/C ratio Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I 1,09 dan dan Kelompok Tani Sumber Makmur 1, Secara umum anggota kelompok tani baik di Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I maupun Kelompok Tani Sumber Makmur dalam mengelola usaha ternak sapi potong belum menunjukkan adanya penerapan manajemen agribisnis secara baik dan benar, walau secara individual khususnya anggota Kelompok Tani Sumber Rejeki I sebagian menerapkan manajemen agribisnis (terutama yang ternaknya ada di kandang kelompok).

Kata Kunci: Kelayakan Usaha, Penerapan Subsistem Agribisnis.

^*)**)  Staf Pengajar STPP Magelang

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Gulo, W. 2004. Metodologi Pertanian. Gramedia. Jakarta.

Hasan, Iqbal. 2002. Pokok-Pokok Materi Statistik (Statistik Deskriptif). Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Milles dan Huberman. 1992. Analisa Data Kualitatif. UI Press. Jakarta.

Purwanto,  Joko. 2005. Faktor-Faktor Sosial Ekonomi yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Petani Tembakau Terhadap Kredut Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) di Kecamatan Selo Kabupaten Solotigo. Skripsi Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta. Unpublised.

Singarimbun, M dan Effendi S. 1989. Metode Penelitian Survey. LP3ES Jakarta.

Soekartawi. 1993. Analisis Usaha Tani. Universitas Indonesia Press Jakarta.

Surakhmad, W. 1994. Metode Ilmiah Penelitian, Metode dan Teknik Penelitian. Tarsito Bandung.

PENGARUH PEMBERDAYAAN PETANI DENGAN MODEL INKUBATOR AGRIBISNIS TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KELOMPOK TANI DI WILAYAH MAGELANG DAN SEKITARNYA

Y. Hariyanto*

ABSTRACT

The research was done on March until July 2009, in Regency : Magelang, Temanggung And Wonosobo, Central Java, where in the area there are farmer group followed the activity orienting at Center of Incubator Agribusiness. Research Target 1) Knowing condition and ability of farmer group after following activity PIA, 2) Evaluating IPO-PIA to know the role of each aspect of management PIA in farmer enableness, 3) Knowing relation of between Program PIA with the empower of farmer. We taked 12 manager people of farmer groups, 12 people of extension agent or counsellor, 12 farmers people obtained from 12 farmer groups residing in 3 region (Magelang, Temanggung And Wonosobo) as samples of reserach. The election of samples was done by the simple random sampling method.

The result of this research; the Incubator Agribusiness Program, have been done a evaluation model the IPO (input, process, output), by placing dynamics of group and group profile as input, group activity as process, and group ability as output, hence result of evaluation indicate that there are harmonious of execution of construction of dynamics of group and group profile with the process of execution PIA representing nucleus; core from process PIA so that yield the ability of farmer group at category of Group Madya. Result of statistical analysis is indication that between input, process and output, having hand in glove relation, and in very real variable of group dynamics, group profile, and group activity have an effect on to group ability. the relation pattern can formulation :

            Y = 6,807 + 0,144X₁ + 0,018X₂ + 0,665X₃      by    R² = 0,637

But that way, relation partial of between the variable, only variable process the (group activity) just having an effect on to group dynamics, and other variable second have an effect on very small.

Key word; Empower of farmer, Center of Incubator Agribusiness.

* Staf Pengajar Sekolah Tinggi Penyuluhan Pertanian (STPP) Magelang

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anonim.1989. Pedoman Pembinaan Kelompok Tani-Nelayan. Badan Pendidikan ,Latihan dan Penyuluhan Pertanian. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta.

Abdul Adjid, D. (2001). Agribisnis. Jakarta . Yayasan Pengembangan Sinar Tani.

Abbas, Syamsuddin. 1995. Sembilanpuluh Tahun Penyuluhan Pertanian di Indonesia (1905 – 2005).Badan Diklat Pertanian Deptan, Jakarta.

           

Chambers R, Cetyakan ke 8, 2001. PRA – Participatory Rural Appraisal, Memahami Desa Secara Partisipatif. Penerbit Kanisius.

Marzuki, Syamsiah. 1999. Pembinaan Kelompok. Modul Universitas Terbuka. Penerbit Universitas Terbuka. Depdikbud. Jakarta.

Mosher, A. T. 1986. Menggerakkan dan membangun Pertanian. CV. Yasaguna. Jakarta.

Musnir, Diana Nomida. 2000. Arah Pendidikan Nasional dalam Perspektif Historis. Dalam: Menggagas Paradigma Baru Pendidikan.Sindhunata (editor). Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

PARTISIPASI PETANI DALAM PROGRAM PENGEMBANGAN KEGIATAN YANG RESPONSIF GENDER DI JAWA TENGAH

(The Participation Of The Farmers In Development Program Of Gender Responsive Activity In Central Java)

 S. Rahayu*, Suharti*, Y. Hariyanto*

ABSTRACT

The objective of the research: (1) to identify social characteristic of farmer’s economy related to farmer’s participation in Development Program of Gender Responsive Activity in Central Java, (2) to identify farmer’s participation level in Development Program of Gender Responsive Activity, (3) to identify the correlation between social characteristic of farmer’s economy and farmer’s participation level in Development Program of Gender Responsive Activity, (4) to identify whether there is significant difference in participation of the women and men in it.

Material and instrument of research: Development Program of Gender Responsive Activity, questionnaire, stationery, and calculators. Basic method used in the research is descriptive method with survey technique: method of collecting sample/ respondent used is census technique to all farmers joining the program. The location chosen is purposive, considering the participative village in the program, namely Kupangan Wonosobo, Kenteng Semarang, and Sanggrahan Temanggung. Technique in collecting data: interview, observation, and note. Data analysis to identify the correlation between factors and farmer’s participation level in Development Program of Gender Responsive Activity uses Rank Spearman (rs),to identify the significance of rs uses T test with 95% validity and to identify test of difference between participation of women and men uses T test median.

            The result shows that farmer’s participation level is high, there’s no significant correlation of formal education (X1) and farmer’s participation (Y); there is significant correlation between revenue level (X2) and farmer’s participation (Y); and there is significant correlation between farmer’s experience (X3) and farmer’s participation (Y). and there’s no significant correlation between the participation of women and men in Program of Gender Responsive Activity.

Key word: participation, gender responsive activity

*Staf pengajar Sekolah Tinggi Penyuluhan Pertanian Magelang

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Djohani dkk. 1996. Buku Acuan Penerapan PRA Berbuat Bersama Berperan Setara. Studio Driya Media. Bandung.

Mardikanto, T., dan Sri Sutarni. 1982. Pengantar Penyuluhan Pertanian dalam Teori dan Praktek. Hapsara. Surakarta.

Sevilla, Consuelo G., Jesus A Ochave, Twila G Punsalan, Bella P Regala, Gabriel G Uriarte. 1993. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Universitas Indonesia Press. Jakarta.

Siegel, Sidney. 1994. Statistika Non Parametrik Untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Gramedia. Jakarta.